Home/Case Law/FERNANDO MENDOZA vs. CR&R INCORPORATED, XL INSURANCE AMERICA, INC.
Regular DecisionRemoval

FERNANDO MENDOZA vs. CR&R INCORPORATED, XL INSURANCE AMERICA, INC.

Filed: May 05, 2017
Van Nuys
ADJ10575430

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal in the case of Mendoza v. CR&R Inc. Removal is an extraordinary remedy, granted only if substantial prejudice or irreparable harm will occur and reconsideration will not be an adequate remedy. The Board found that the defendant failed to demonstrate these criteria based on the Administrative Law Judge's report and analysis. Therefore, the petition was denied, allowing the case to proceed through the standard review process.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal in the case of Mendoza v. CR&R Inc. Removal is an extraordinary remedy, granted only if substantial prejudice or irreparable harm will occur and reconsideration will not be an adequate remedy. The Board found that the defendant failed to demonstrate these criteria based on the Administrative Law Judge's report and analysis. Therefore, the petition was denied, allowing the case to proceed through the standard review process.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

FERNANDO MENDOZA vs. CR&R INCORPORATED, XL INSURANCE AMERICA, INC. (2017) – Van Nuys | CompFox