Home/Case Law/FERNANDO GOMEZ vs. DESICCARE, INC., FREMONT INSURANCE in liquidation by CIGA, REDLAND INSURANCE and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STRATEGIC OURSOURCING, TWIN CITY FIRE administered by SRS
Regular Decision

FERNANDO GOMEZ vs. DESICCARE, INC., FREMONT INSURANCE in liquidation by CIGA, REDLAND INSURANCE and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STRATEGIC OURSOURCING, TWIN CITY FIRE administered by SRS

Filed: Mar 22, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ353115 VNO 0507183 ADJ3815018 VNO 0507186 ADJ2106065 VNO 0507185

CompFox AI Summary

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board order denies Fernando Gomez's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the workers' compensation administrative law judge's report, which provided the reasons for denial. The specific grounds for the denial are not detailed in this order but are incorporated by reference from the judge's report. This decision upholds the original ruling in Gomez's case against multiple defendants and insurers.

FERNANDO GOMEZ vs. DESICCARE, INC., FREMONT INSURANCE in liquidation by CIGA, REDLAND INSURANCE and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STRATEGIC OURSOURCING, TWIN CITY FIRE administered by SRS is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board order denies Fernando Gomez's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the workers' compensation administrative law judge's report, which provided the reasons for denial. The specific grounds for the denial are not detailed in this order but are incorporated by reference from the judge's report. This decision upholds the original ruling in Gomez's case against multiple defendants and insurers.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

FERNANDO GOMEZ vs. DESICCARE, INC., FREMONT INSURANCE in liquidation by CIGA, REDLAND INSURANCE and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STRATEGIC OURSOURCING, TWIN CITY FIRE administered by SRS workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

FERNANDO GOMEZ vs. DESICCARE, INC., FREMONT INSURANCE in liquidation by CIGA, REDLAND INSURANCE and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STRATEGIC OURSOURCING, TWIN CITY FIRE administered by SRS case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

FERNANDO GOMEZ vs. DESICCARE, INC., FREMONT INSURANCE in liquidation by CIGA, REDLAND INSURANCE and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STRATEGIC OURSOURCING, TWIN CITY FIRE administered by SRS Case Analysis

FERNANDO GOMEZ vs. DESICCARE, INC., FREMONT INSURANCE in liquidation by CIGA, REDLAND INSURANCE and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STRATEGIC OURSOURCING, TWIN CITY FIRE administered by SRS is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.