Home/Case Law/FELIX CABRERA vs. OAA INVESTMENTS, INC.; CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORP.
Regular DecisionOpinion and Decision After Reconsideration

FELIX CABRERA vs. OAA INVESTMENTS, INC.; CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORP.

Filed: Jun 05, 2025
San Diego
ADJ11114421

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant California Restaurant Mutual Benefit Corporation (CRMBC) sought reconsideration of a February 19, 2021 Findings and Order (F&O) which found CRMBC liable for coverage of applicant Felix Cabrera's injury, ruling that CRMBC's policy cancellation was premature. CRMBC contended it had no coverage obligations as the applicant was employed by OAA Investments, Inc., not insured by CRMBC, and argued against the applicability of Insurance Code section 676.8. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCA's F&O, treating the petition as one for reconsideration, and found that under Insurance Code section 676.8 and equitable principles, CRMBC was liable for coverage. The Board reasoned that due to a material change in ownership, CRMBC's cancellation notice required 30 days' notice, making January 27, 2018, the earliest effective cancellation date, which was after the November 22, 2017 injury date.

FELIX CABRERA vs. OAA INVESTMENTS, INC.; CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORP. is a workers' compensation case decided in San Diego. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Diego.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant California Restaurant Mutual Benefit Corporation (CRMBC) sought reconsideration of a February 19, 2021 Findings and Order (F&O) which found CRMBC liable for coverage of applicant Felix Cabrera's injury, ruling that CRMBC's policy cancellation was premature. CRMBC contended it had no coverage obligations as the applicant was employed by OAA Investments, Inc., not insured by CRMBC, and argued against the applicability of Insurance Code section 676.8. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCA's F&O, treating the petition as one for reconsideration, and found that under Insurance Code section 676.8 and equitable principles, CRMBC was liable for coverage. The Board reasoned that due to a material change in ownership, CRMBC's cancellation notice required 30 days' notice, making January 27, 2018, the earliest effective cancellation date, which was after the November 22, 2017 injury date.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

FELIX CABRERA vs. OAA INVESTMENTS, INC.; CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORP. workers compensation case in San Diego. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

FELIX CABRERA vs. OAA INVESTMENTS, INC.; CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORP. case law summary from San Diego. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

FELIX CABRERA vs. OAA INVESTMENTS, INC.; CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORP. Case Analysis

FELIX CABRERA vs. OAA INVESTMENTS, INC.; CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORP. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Diego. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.