Home/Case Law/Felix Aguilar vs. WAREHOUSE DISCOUNT CENTER; SCIF INSURED OXNARD
Regular Decision

Felix Aguilar vs. WAREHOUSE DISCOUNT CENTER; SCIF INSURED OXNARD

Filed: Jun 15, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ2796539 (LAO 0840098) ADJ4363495 (LAO 0840099) ADJ7155229

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for removal as moot because the AME examination date had passed. The defendant sought to prevent the applicant's attorney from having ex parte communications with the AME. While dismissing the petition, the Board clarified that ex parte communications with an AME are prohibited under Labor Code section 4062.3(f) and can result in significant penalties. These penalties include the aggrieved party's ability to terminate the evaluation and seek a new one, as well as sanctions for costs and attorney's fees.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for removal as moot because the AME examination date had passed. The defendant sought to prevent the applicant's attorney from having ex parte communications with the AME. While dismissing the petition, the Board clarified that ex parte communications with an AME are prohibited under Labor Code section 4062.3(f) and can result in significant penalties. These penalties include the aggrieved party's ability to terminate the evaluation and seek a new one, as well as sanctions for costs and attorney's fees.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Felix Aguilar vs. WAREHOUSE DISCOUNT CENTER; SCIF INSURED OXNARD (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox