CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a worker injured in an industrial eye injury who also claims psychological injury and a consequential shoulder injury. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address the employer's challenge to the psychological injury finding, agreeing that the medical evidence for it was not substantial. The Board also noted that the award for reimbursement to EDD requires clarification due to the potential reduction in permanent disability. The matter is returned to the trial judge for further proceedings and a new final decision on these issues.
FEDERICO PARDO vs. FELIX MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., VIRGINIA SURETY COMPANY, APPLIED RISK SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a worker injured in an industrial eye injury who also claims psychological injury and a consequential shoulder injury. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address the employer's challenge to the psychological injury finding, agreeing that the medical evidence for it was not substantial. The Board also noted that the award for reimbursement to EDD requires clarification due to the potential reduction in permanent disability. The matter is returned to the trial judge for further proceedings and a new final decision on these issues.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.