CompFox AI Summary
Applicant Fareed Roshandell, who previously sustained injuries, sought reconsideration of a June 3, 2025 decision by a Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ). The WCJ had taken the matter off calendar and made findings without an evidentiary record, including deeming a medical report invalid and noting service irregularities. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration but granted the petition to treat it as a petition for removal. Citing due process violations and the lack of an evidentiary record, the Board rescinded the WCJ's June 3, 2025 decision and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with their opinion.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Applicant Fareed Roshandell, who previously sustained injuries, sought reconsideration of a June 3, 2025 decision by a Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ). The WCJ had taken the matter off calendar and made findings without an evidentiary record, including deeming a medical report invalid and noting service irregularities. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration but granted the petition to treat it as a petition for removal. Citing due process violations and the lack of an evidentiary record, the Board rescinded the WCJ's June 3, 2025 decision and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with their opinion.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.