CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and reversed the finding of a psychiatric injury for an applicant employed less than six months. The WCAB determined that the applicant's injury, sustained when a driver intentionally struck her with a vehicle, did not constitute a sudden and extraordinary employment condition as required by Labor Code section 3208.3(d). Evidence indicated such events, while unfortunate, were not uncommon for traffic officers, and training existed to handle them. Therefore, the psychiatric injury claim was barred due to the insufficient employment duration.
FALISE HARRELL JACKSON vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES/DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and reversed the finding of a psychiatric injury for an applicant employed less than six months. The WCAB determined that the applicant's injury, sustained when a driver intentionally struck her with a vehicle, did not constitute a "sudden and extraordinary employment condition" as required by Labor Code section 3208.3(d). Evidence indicated such events, while unfortunate, were not uncommon for traffic officers, and training existed to handle them. Therefore, the psychiatric injury claim was barred due to the insufficient employment duration.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.