Home/Case Law/EXTRAIN ZARATE vs. ALFONSO ZARATE CONTRACTOR, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

EXTRAIN ZARATE vs. ALFONSO ZARATE CONTRACTOR, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation

Filed: Apr 13, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ1947410 (FRE 0176771)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and disallowed RS Medical's lien for $1,734.74. The Board found that RS Medical failed to meet its burden of proof by presenting insufficient evidence that the medical goods or services provided were reasonable and necessary for the applicant's industrial injury. The only evidence was prescriptions without supporting medical reports detailing necessity or causation. Defendant's failure to object to the lien did not relieve RS Medical of its evidentiary obligations.

EXTRAIN ZARATE vs. ALFONSO ZARATE CONTRACTOR, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and disallowed RS Medical's lien for $1,734.74. The Board found that RS Medical failed to meet its burden of proof by presenting insufficient evidence that the medical goods or services provided were reasonable and necessary for the applicant's industrial injury. The only evidence was prescriptions without supporting medical reports detailing necessity or causation. Defendant's failure to object to the lien did not relieve RS Medical of its evidentiary obligations.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

EXTRAIN ZARATE vs. ALFONSO ZARATE CONTRACTOR, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

EXTRAIN ZARATE vs. ALFONSO ZARATE CONTRACTOR, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

EXTRAIN ZARATE vs. ALFONSO ZARATE CONTRACTOR, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation Case Analysis

EXTRAIN ZARATE vs. ALFONSO ZARATE CONTRACTOR, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.