Home/Case Law/EXTRAIN QUINTANA vs. RANCHO GRANDE SUPERMARKET, NORTH RIVER INSURANCE CO. by CRUM & FORSTER
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

EXTRAIN QUINTANA vs. RANCHO GRANDE SUPERMARKET, NORTH RIVER INSURANCE CO. by CRUM & FORSTER

Filed: Dec 31, 2013
Anaheim
ADJ8189296

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a petition for removal challenging an order for sanctions against a lien claimant for failing to pay a lien activation fee. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition for removal, finding reconsideration to be the proper avenue. However, construing the petition as a request for reconsideration, the Board granted it. The Board rescinded the sanctions order due to uncertainty regarding a federal injunction impacting the lien activation fee provisions and remanded the matter for further proceedings.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a petition for removal challenging an order for sanctions against a lien claimant for failing to pay a lien activation fee. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition for removal, finding reconsideration to be the proper avenue. However, construing the petition as a request for reconsideration, the Board granted it. The Board rescinded the sanctions order due to uncertainty regarding a federal injunction impacting the lien activation fee provisions and remanded the matter for further proceedings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

EXTRAIN QUINTANA vs. RANCHO GRANDE SUPERMARKET, NORTH RIVER INSURANCE CO. by CRUM & FORSTER (2013) – Anaheim | CompFox