CompFox AI Summary
Defendant sought reconsideration of the April 11, 2025 Findings, Award, and Orders (FA&O), where the WCJ found the reporting of PQME, Dr. Albert Simpkins, to be substantial medical evidence, with the exception of apportionment. Applicant, Evyette Gaines, was found to have sustained injury AOE/COE to the cervical spine, lumbar spine, and psyche, resulting in 38% permanent disability. Defendant contended that Dr. Simpkins' apportionment findings constituted substantial medical evidence and that the WCJ misapplied legal precedents. After considering the petition and the WCJ's report, the Appeals Board denied the Petition for Reconsideration.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Defendant sought reconsideration of the April 11, 2025 Findings, Award, and Orders (FA&O), where the WCJ found the reporting of PQME, Dr. Albert Simpkins, to be substantial medical evidence, with the exception of apportionment. Applicant, Evyette Gaines, was found to have sustained injury AOE/COE to the cervical spine, lumbar spine, and psyche, resulting in 38% permanent disability. Defendant contended that Dr. Simpkins' apportionment findings constituted substantial medical evidence and that the WCJ misapplied legal precedents. After considering the petition and the WCJ's report, the Appeals Board denied the Petition for Reconsideration.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.