Home/Case Law/EVELIA CENDEJAS vs. MERLE NORMAN COSMETICS, ARROWPOINT CAPITAL CORPORATION, ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE, CAMBRIDGE, STAR STAFFING SERVICES, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

EVELIA CENDEJAS vs. MERLE NORMAN COSMETICS, ARROWPOINT CAPITAL CORPORATION, ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE, CAMBRIDGE, STAR STAFFING SERVICES, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Apr 04, 2008
San Francisco
VNO 0413573

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of an award, affirming the finding of special and general employment but deferring the payment of benefits. This deferral is to allow the insurers to resolve their liability dispute through mandatory arbitration, as the WCJ's decision regarding which insurer was responsible was unclear and lacked a proper legal basis. The Board clarified that once the arbitration is complete, a final award can be made.

EVELIA CENDEJAS vs. MERLE NORMAN COSMETICS, ARROWPOINT CAPITAL CORPORATION, ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE, CAMBRIDGE, STAR STAFFING SERVICES, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of an award, affirming the finding of special and general employment but deferring the payment of benefits. This deferral is to allow the insurers to resolve their liability dispute through mandatory arbitration, as the WCJ's decision regarding which insurer was responsible was unclear and lacked a proper legal basis. The Board clarified that once the arbitration is complete, a final award can be made.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

EVELIA CENDEJAS vs. MERLE NORMAN COSMETICS, ARROWPOINT CAPITAL CORPORATION, ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE, CAMBRIDGE, STAR STAFFING SERVICES, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

EVELIA CENDEJAS vs. MERLE NORMAN COSMETICS, ARROWPOINT CAPITAL CORPORATION, ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE, CAMBRIDGE, STAR STAFFING SERVICES, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

EVELIA CENDEJAS vs. MERLE NORMAN COSMETICS, ARROWPOINT CAPITAL CORPORATION, ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE, CAMBRIDGE, STAR STAFFING SERVICES, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

EVELIA CENDEJAS vs. MERLE NORMAN COSMETICS, ARROWPOINT CAPITAL CORPORATION, ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE, CAMBRIDGE, STAR STAFFING SERVICES, INC., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.