Home/Case Law/EVA PATINO vs. ROYAL IMEX, INC., GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular Decision

EVA PATINO vs. ROYAL IMEX, INC., GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Aug 16, 2018
Anaheim
ADJ8698876

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because it sought to challenge an interlocutory procedural order, not a final decision. The Board also denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm resulting from the order. The order did not restrict discovery on all issues, merely noted a deposition was scheduled on temporary disability. Finally, defense counsel was admonished for violating board rules by improperly attaching prior documents to their petition.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because it sought to challenge an interlocutory procedural order, not a final decision. The Board also denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm resulting from the order. The order did not restrict discovery on all issues, merely noted a deposition was scheduled on temporary disability. Finally, defense counsel was admonished for violating board rules by improperly attaching prior documents to their petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

EVA PATINO vs. ROYAL IMEX, INC., GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY (2018) – Anaheim | CompFox