Home/Case Law/ETHAN PRATH KOLLAR vs. ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT, AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ETHAN PRATH KOLLAR vs. ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT, AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Feb 10, 2017
San Francisco
ADJ3437654 (AHM 0142431) ADJ317167 (AHM 0149524)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied defendant's petition for reconsideration or removal. The Board found the WCJ properly deferred issues of out-of-pocket medical expenses pending further discovery. The Board also affirmed the WCJ's order for reasonable and necessary medical treatment for the applicant's stress injury, noting that the defendant had stipulated to this injury and listed stress as a body part in a prior settlement agreement. Therefore, the defendant's arguments regarding lack of due process and the definition of stress as a body part were deemed unconvincing.

ETHAN PRATH KOLLAR vs. ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT, AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied defendant's petition for reconsideration or removal. The Board found the WCJ properly deferred issues of out-of-pocket medical expenses pending further discovery. The Board also affirmed the WCJ's order for reasonable and necessary medical treatment for the applicant's "stress" injury, noting that the defendant had stipulated to this injury and listed "stress" as a body part in a prior settlement agreement. Therefore, the defendant's arguments regarding lack of due process and the definition of "stress" as a body part were deemed unconvincing.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ETHAN PRATH KOLLAR vs. ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT, AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ETHAN PRATH KOLLAR vs. ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT, AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ETHAN PRATH KOLLAR vs. ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT, AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

ETHAN PRATH KOLLAR vs. ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT, AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.