CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the administrative law judge's order dismissing the lien claimant's claim. The Board found that the lien claimant was not properly served with notice of the intention to dismiss and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings. The Board also noted that while a notice of intention to award attorney's fees is not a final order, the lien claimant's failure to appear at trial may warrant sanctions under Labor Code section 5813 if not reasonably excused.
ESTHER RIOS vs. NORDSTROM, Permissibly Self-Insured is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the administrative law judge's order dismissing the lien claimant's claim. The Board found that the lien claimant was not properly served with notice of the intention to dismiss and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings. The Board also noted that while a notice of intention to award attorney's fees is not a final order, the lien claimant's failure to appear at trial may warrant sanctions under Labor Code section 5813 if not reasonably excused.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.