Home/Case Law/ESTELLA HOYOS-MARTINEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS; Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ESTELLA HOYOS-MARTINEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS; Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES

Filed: Sep 07, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ3137830

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration as untimely. The defendant's petition was filed on June 2, 2010, but the relevant deadline, considering mailing service on April 15, 2010, was May 10, 2010. The WCAB found that the defendant was properly served by mail and their claim of late receipt was unsubstantiated. Therefore, the WCAB upheld its prior decision and dismissed the defendant's petition.

ESTELLA HOYOS-MARTINEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS; Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration as untimely. The defendant's petition was filed on June 2, 2010, but the relevant deadline, considering mailing service on April 15, 2010, was May 10, 2010. The WCAB found that the defendant was properly served by mail and their claim of late receipt was unsubstantiated. Therefore, the WCAB upheld its prior decision and dismissed the defendant's petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ESTELLA HOYOS-MARTINEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS; Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ESTELLA HOYOS-MARTINEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS; Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ESTELLA HOYOS-MARTINEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS; Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES Case Analysis

ESTELLA HOYOS-MARTINEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS; Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.