Home/Case Law/ESTELA ACEVEDO vs. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, SEDGWICK CMS
Regular DecisionOrder Dismissing Petition for Removal

ESTELA ACEVEDO vs. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, SEDGWICK CMS

Filed: Jul 23, 2008
San Francisco
LAO 0864285

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's petition for removal as untimely, as it was filed 22 days after the order it sought to challenge, exceeding the 20-day limit. The WCAB also noted that even if the petition had been timely, it would have been denied on its merits, finding the defendant's request for a panel of qualified medical evaluators perplexing given the stipulated injury date and applicant's legal representation. Consequently, the case is returned to the trial level for proceedings as scheduled.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's petition for removal as untimely, as it was filed 22 days after the order it sought to challenge, exceeding the 20-day limit. The WCAB also noted that even if the petition had been timely, it would have been denied on its merits, finding the defendant's request for a panel of qualified medical evaluators perplexing given the stipulated injury date and applicant's legal representation. Consequently, the case is returned to the trial level for proceedings as scheduled.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ESTELA ACEVEDO vs. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, SEDGWICK CMS (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox