Home/Case Law/ESPERANZA JACKSON vs. SAN FRANCISCO MARRIOTT, MARRIOTT CLAIMS SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ESPERANZA JACKSON vs. SAN FRANCISCO MARRIOTT, MARRIOTT CLAIMS SERVICES

Filed: Jan 20, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ1644350 (SFO 0474033)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns an applicant's petition for reconsideration of a decision to rescind a retroactive VRMA award. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's (WCJ) finding. The WCJ determined, based on the precedent set in Weiner v. Ralphs Company, that the Rehabilitation Unit award was not final before January 1, 2009, due to a pending defendant's appeal. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's report, finding the Weiner decision controlling and binding until higher court review.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns an applicant's petition for reconsideration of a decision to rescind a retroactive VRMA award. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's (WCJ) finding. The WCJ determined, based on the precedent set in Weiner v. Ralphs Company, that the Rehabilitation Unit award was not final before January 1, 2009, due to a pending defendant's appeal. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's report, finding the Weiner decision controlling and binding until higher court review.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ESPERANZA JACKSON vs. SAN FRANCISCO MARRIOTT, MARRIOTT CLAIMS SERVICES (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox