Home/Case Law/ERNESTO NORIEGA vs. ROYAL CABINETS, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

ERNESTO NORIEGA vs. ROYAL CABINETS, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Jan 03, 2020
Santa Ana
ADJ10838822

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Ernesto Noriega's petition for reconsideration. The Board found that the medical opinions of Drs. Levine and Harris were not substantial evidence. These opinions failed to adequately support a finding of injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment due to being based on incorrect facts, history, or legal theories. Therefore, the prior decision stands.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Ernesto Noriega's petition for reconsideration. The Board found that the medical opinions of Drs. Levine and Harris were not substantial evidence. These opinions failed to adequately support a finding of injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment due to being based on incorrect facts, history, or legal theories. Therefore, the prior decision stands.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ERNESTO NORIEGA vs. ROYAL CABINETS, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY (2020) – Santa Ana | CompFox