CompFox AI Summary
This case involves an applicant's petition for reconsideration that was dismissed as untimely. The applicant sought reconsideration of two prior decisions: a July 26, 2007 decision that rescinded an award and returned the case for further development, and a December 1, 2008 decision that dismissed a prior untimely petition. Both the July 2007 and December 2008 decisions were served by mail, triggering statutory time limits for filing a petition for reconsideration. The March 2, 2009 petition was filed well beyond these deadlines, rendering it untimely.
ERIC HASKINS vs. LAIDLAW EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves an applicant's petition for reconsideration that was dismissed as untimely. The applicant sought reconsideration of two prior decisions: a July 26, 2007 decision that rescinded an award and returned the case for further development, and a December 1, 2008 decision that dismissed a prior untimely petition. Both the July 2007 and December 2008 decisions were served by mail, triggering statutory time limits for filing a petition for reconsideration. The March 2, 2009 petition was filed well beyond these deadlines, rendering it untimely.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.