CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a workers' compensation claim where the applicant, Erasmo Quintanilla Aviles, sought benefits for industrial injuries. The defendant, Pacer International, challenged the finding that the applicant was an employee, arguing lack of persuasive control and misinterpretation of their contract. The applicant also contested the findings regarding the specific body parts injured. After granting reconsideration, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the original decision in its entirety. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, denying the defendant's petition and upholding the finding of industrial injury and employee status.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a workers' compensation claim where the applicant, Erasmo Quintanilla Aviles, sought benefits for industrial injuries. The defendant, Pacer International, challenged the finding that the applicant was an employee, arguing lack of persuasive control and misinterpretation of their contract. The applicant also contested the findings regarding the specific body parts injured. After granting reconsideration, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the original decision in its entirety. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, denying the defendant's petition and upholding the finding of industrial injury and employee status.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.