Home/Case Law/ENRIQUE FLORES vs. CALIFORNIA STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ENRIQUE FLORES vs. CALIFORNIA STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES

Filed: Aug 20, 2019
Los Angeles
ADJ10815590

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a WCJ's order that awarded ManagedMed, Inc. only $184.05 for its lien claim. The Board found the record insufficient, noting inconsistencies between the order and the WCJ's report, and a lack of evidence that the order was properly served to determine the timeliness of ManagedMed's petition. Consequently, the Board rescinded the order and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings, suggesting a lien conference or trial.

ENRIQUE FLORES vs. CALIFORNIA STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES is a workers' compensation case decided in Los Angeles. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Los Angeles.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a WCJ's order that awarded ManagedMed, Inc. only $184.05 for its lien claim. The Board found the record insufficient, noting inconsistencies between the order and the WCJ's report, and a lack of evidence that the order was properly served to determine the timeliness of ManagedMed's petition. Consequently, the Board rescinded the order and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings, suggesting a lien conference or trial.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ENRIQUE FLORES vs. CALIFORNIA STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES workers compensation case in Los Angeles. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ENRIQUE FLORES vs. CALIFORNIA STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES case law summary from Los Angeles. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ENRIQUE FLORES vs. CALIFORNIA STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES Case Analysis

ENRIQUE FLORES vs. CALIFORNIA STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Los Angeles. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.