CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed one day late. The defendant argued the administrative law judge erred in applying the Almaraz/Guzman II standards to calculate the applicant's permanent disability. However, the Board found the petition was untimely and therefore must be dismissed, noting it would have been denied on the merits otherwise. The deadline for filing was October 4, 2010, and the petition was received on October 5, 2010.
ENRIQUE CASTANEDA vs. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed one day late. The defendant argued the administrative law judge erred in applying the Almaraz/Guzman II standards to calculate the applicant's permanent disability. However, the Board found the petition was untimely and therefore must be dismissed, noting it would have been denied on the merits otherwise. The deadline for filing was October 4, 2010, and the petition was received on October 5, 2010.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.