Home/Case Law/ENOC (EROC) VARGAS vs. NWB BUILDING CONTRACTORS, LWP CLAIMS SOLUTIONS
Regular DecisionReconsideration and Removal

ENOC (EROC) VARGAS vs. NWB BUILDING CONTRACTORS, LWP CLAIMS SOLUTIONS

Filed: Aug 20, 2007
San Francisco
POM 294416

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because the order from which it appealed was interlocutory and not a final order, and because the petition was unverified. The Board also denied the applicant's Petition for Removal, finding no significant prejudice or irreparable harm, as the WCJ correctly noted a lack of admissible evidence to support the applicant's claims for temporary disability and medical treatment. Therefore, the applicant's procedural challenges to the WCJ's decision to take the matter off calendar were unsuccessful.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because the order from which it appealed was interlocutory and not a final order, and because the petition was unverified. The Board also denied the applicant's Petition for Removal, finding no significant prejudice or irreparable harm, as the WCJ correctly noted a lack of admissible evidence to support the applicant's claims for temporary disability and medical treatment. Therefore, the applicant's procedural challenges to the WCJ's decision to take the matter off calendar were unsuccessful.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ENOC (EROC) VARGAS vs. NWB BUILDING CONTRACTORS, LWP CLAIMS SOLUTIONS (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox