CompFox AI Summary
This case involves applicant Emmanuel Haro's petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation award based on stipulations. The Board is dismissing the petition because it was not properly served on the defendant and their attorney. Additionally, the petition is deemed "skeletal" as it lacks specific factual and legal arguments with record references. Even if these procedural defects were overlooked, the petition would be denied on the merits because applicant voluntarily agreed to the stipulations with his attorney's assistance, and there is no good cause to withdraw from that agreement.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves applicant Emmanuel Haro's petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation award based on stipulations. The Board is dismissing the petition because it was not properly served on the defendant and their attorney. Additionally, the petition is deemed "skeletal" as it lacks specific factual and legal arguments with record references. Even if these procedural defects were overlooked, the petition would be denied on the merits because applicant voluntarily agreed to the stipulations with his attorney's assistance, and there is no good cause to withdraw from that agreement.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.