CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the WCJ's decision because the record lacked sufficient evidence to support the ruling that defendants were not obligated to pay applicant's rent. The Board found that the WCJ's decision was not based on admitted evidence and lacked the required evidentiary foundation for meaningful review. Consequently, the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings to create a proper record and issue a new decision.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the WCJ's decision because the record lacked sufficient evidence to support the ruling that defendants were not obligated to pay applicant's rent. The Board found that the WCJ's decision was not based on admitted evidence and lacked the required evidentiary foundation for meaningful review. Consequently, the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings to create a proper record and issue a new decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.