Home/Case Law/EMILY CLAUSEN vs. INAMED CORPORATION, GENERAL INSURANCE (SAFECO)
Regular DecisionReconsideration

EMILY CLAUSEN vs. INAMED CORPORATION, GENERAL INSURANCE (SAFECO)

Filed: Jul 07, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ2711362

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to correct the permanent total disability indemnity rate from $$490$ to $$392.52$ per week. The Board affirmed the WCJ's finding of 100% permanent disability due to industrial injury, including fibromyalgia, finding Dr. Salick's opinion substantial evidence. Defendant's due process and apportionment arguments were rejected. The WCAB remanded to the WCJ to clarify the attorney's fee amount and method of payment, specifically how it will be commuted from the lifetime award.

EMILY CLAUSEN vs. INAMED CORPORATION, GENERAL INSURANCE (SAFECO) is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to correct the permanent total disability indemnity rate from $$490$ to $$392.52$ per week. The Board affirmed the WCJ's finding of 100% permanent disability due to industrial injury, including fibromyalgia, finding Dr. Salick's opinion substantial evidence. Defendant's due process and apportionment arguments were rejected. The WCAB remanded to the WCJ to clarify the attorney's fee amount and method of payment, specifically how it will be commuted from the lifetime award.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

EMILY CLAUSEN vs. INAMED CORPORATION, GENERAL INSURANCE (SAFECO) workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

EMILY CLAUSEN vs. INAMED CORPORATION, GENERAL INSURANCE (SAFECO) case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

EMILY CLAUSEN vs. INAMED CORPORATION, GENERAL INSURANCE (SAFECO) Case Analysis

EMILY CLAUSEN vs. INAMED CORPORATION, GENERAL INSURANCE (SAFECO) is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.