CompFox AI Summary
Defendant Clorox sought removal to the Appeals Board to review an order allowing a second deposition of the decedent's QME, arguing prejudice from delay. Defendant contended the applicant waived discovery rights and the issue should be the QME's report's evidentiary value. However, the QME's deposition subsequently occurred. Therefore, the Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Removal as moot and ordered the matter returned to the trial calendar.
EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO, SARA ROMERO vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Defendant Clorox sought removal to the Appeals Board to review an order allowing a second deposition of the decedent's QME, arguing prejudice from delay. Defendant contended the applicant waived discovery rights and the issue should be the QME's report's evidentiary value. However, the QME's deposition subsequently occurred. Therefore, the Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Removal as moot and ordered the matter returned to the trial calendar.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.