Home/Case Law/EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased), SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased), SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES

Filed: Oct 01, 2016
Anaheim
ADJ4052884 (AHM 0136124) ADJ6520242 ADJ7028149

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board removed the matter to itself to review the defendant's petition to disqualify the Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME), Dr. Leonard. While initially dismissed as moot due to Dr. Leonard's deposition proceeding, the Board decided to grant removal to consider the defendant's arguments regarding prejudice from further discovery delays. Ultimately, the Board denied the defendant's petition for removal, finding no extraordinary circumstances or irreparable harm, and returned the matter to the trial level for the WCJ to determine if Dr. Leonard should be replaced as QME.

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased), SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board removed the matter to itself to review the defendant's petition to disqualify the Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME), Dr. Leonard. While initially dismissed as moot due to Dr. Leonard's deposition proceeding, the Board decided to grant removal to consider the defendant's arguments regarding prejudice from further discovery delays. Ultimately, the Board denied the defendant's petition for removal, finding no extraordinary circumstances or irreparable harm, and returned the matter to the trial level for the WCJ to determine if Dr. Leonard should be replaced as QME.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased), SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES workers compensation case in Anaheim. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased), SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES case law summary from Anaheim. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased), SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES Case Analysis

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased), SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Anaheim. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.