Home/Case Law/EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased) SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased) SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING

Filed: Feb 20, 2014
San Francisco
ADJ4052884 (AHM 0136124) ADJ6520242

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, rescinding an order to replace a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME). The WCJ had terminated the QME believing his partial review and stated refusal to review more records showed prejudgment on causation. However, the Appeals Board found it premature to disqualify the QME, noting his opinion of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as an unknown cause of disease could render additional MSDS irrelevant if correct. The Board ordered a deposition of the QME to explore his opinions and any alleged bias before deciding on a replacement, allowing further record development.

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased) SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, rescinding an order to replace a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME). The WCJ had terminated the QME believing his partial review and stated refusal to review more records showed prejudgment on causation. However, the Appeals Board found it premature to disqualify the QME, noting his opinion of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as an unknown cause of disease could render additional MSDS irrelevant if correct. The Board ordered a deposition of the QME to explore his opinions and any alleged bias before deciding on a replacement, allowing further record development.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased) SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased) SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased) SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING Case Analysis

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO (Deceased) SARA ROMERO (Widow) vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.