CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration, rescinded the previous award, and returned the case for further proceedings. This action was based on the finding that the medical evidence concerning the apportionment of the applicant's permanent disability to non-industrial causes was insufficient and speculative. The Board ordered further development of the record to obtain substantial medical evidence on apportionment before a new decision is issued.
EMILIANO MORALES vs. ETIVISTA CONCRETE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration, rescinded the previous award, and returned the case for further proceedings. This action was based on the finding that the medical evidence concerning the apportionment of the applicant's permanent disability to non-industrial causes was insufficient and speculative. The Board ordered further development of the record to obtain substantial medical evidence on apportionment before a new decision is issued.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.