Home/Case Law/ELSIE SMITH vs. LAIDLAW, BROADSPIRE, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ELSIE SMITH vs. LAIDLAW, BROADSPIRE, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND

Filed: Feb 11, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ2610987 (SBR 0304298)

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision denying Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) benefits. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration, upholding the finding that the applicant failed to prove a disabling pre-existing condition before her 2001 injury or a combined permanent disability of at least 70%. The WCAB found the administrative law judge properly relied on the AME's orthopedic opinion and disregarded an older report, also noting the applicant's attorney improperly submitted deposition testimony not in evidence. The attorney was admonished for improper evidence submission and potentially sanctionable conduct.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision denying Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) benefits. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration, upholding the finding that the applicant failed to prove a disabling pre-existing condition before her 2001 injury or a combined permanent disability of at least 70%. The WCAB found the administrative law judge properly relied on the AME's orthopedic opinion and disregarded an older report, also noting the applicant's attorney improperly submitted deposition testimony not in evidence. The attorney was admonished for improper evidence submission and potentially sanctionable conduct.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.