Home/Case Law/ELSA UMANZOR vs. TWO CHEFS ON A INSPE, INSURANCE, administered by SEDG, CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ELSA UMANZOR vs. TWO CHEFS ON A INSPE, INSURANCE, administered by SEDG, CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Dec 04, 2017
Los Angeles
ADJ9010662

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, correcting a typo to clarify that Dr. Shlens found no work-related injury. The Board gave significant weight to the WCJ's credibility determinations and found no substantial evidence to reject them. Therefore, the applicant's petition for reconsideration was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, correcting a typo to clarify that Dr. Shlens found no work-related injury. The Board gave significant weight to the WCJ's credibility determinations and found no substantial evidence to reject them. Therefore, the applicant's petition for reconsideration was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ELSA UMANZOR vs. TWO CHEFS ON A INSPE, INSURANCE, administered by SEDG, CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2017) – Los Angeles | CompFox