CompFox AI Summary
Plaintiff Kimberly A. Elkjer, an attorney, sued her firm, Defendant Scheef & Stone, L.L.P., alleging gender-based unlawful employment practices under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Defendant moved to stay the case and compel arbitration, citing an arbitration clause in the Partnership Agreement that Plaintiff had signed. The Court granted the Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a sur-reply. After considering the arguments, the Court granted the Defendant's motion, concluding that a valid arbitration agreement existed and Plaintiff's claims fell within its broad scope. The Court also held, in the alternative, that equitable estoppel would allow the non-signatory Defendant to compel arbitration. The case is stayed, and Plaintiff's claims are ordered to arbitration.
Elkjer v. Scheef & Stone, L.L.P. is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, N.D. Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, N.D. Texas.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Plaintiff Kimberly A. Elkjer, an attorney, sued her firm, Defendant Scheef & Stone, L.L.P., alleging gender-based unlawful employment practices under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Defendant moved to stay the case and compel arbitration, citing an arbitration clause in the Partnership Agreement that Plaintiff had signed. The Court granted the Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a sur-reply. After considering the arguments, the Court granted the Defendant's motion, concluding that a valid arbitration agreement existed and Plaintiff's claims fell within its broad scope. The Court also held, in the alternative, that equitable estoppel would allow the non-signatory Defendant to compel arbitration. The case is stayed, and Plaintiff's claims are ordered to arbitration.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.