Home/Case Law/ELIZABETH COCHRAN vs. SUBSEQUENT INJURIES FUND, WINSHIP PROPERTIES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ELIZABETH COCHRAN vs. SUBSEQUENT INJURIES FUND, WINSHIP PROPERTIES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Apr 28, 2016
San Francisco
ADJ2 701373 (SFO 0461093)

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant, Elizabeth Cochran, sought reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision denying her claim for Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) benefits commencing earlier than September 4, 2013. The WCAB denied reconsideration, adopting the findings of the administrative law judge. The applicant argued that permanent total disability payments should begin upon the cessation of temporary disability, citing Brower v. David Jones Construction. However, the WCAB distinguished this case by noting the applicant's injury predated a relevant statutory amendment and that she sought SIBTF benefits, not permanent disability benefits, making Brower's analysis inapplicable.

ELIZABETH COCHRAN vs. SUBSEQUENT INJURIES FUND, WINSHIP PROPERTIES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant, Elizabeth Cochran, sought reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision denying her claim for Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) benefits commencing earlier than September 4, 2013. The WCAB denied reconsideration, adopting the findings of the administrative law judge. The applicant argued that permanent total disability payments should begin upon the cessation of temporary disability, citing Brower v. David Jones Construction. However, the WCAB distinguished this case by noting the applicant's injury predated a relevant statutory amendment and that she sought SIBTF benefits, not permanent disability benefits, making Brower's analysis inapplicable.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ELIZABETH COCHRAN vs. SUBSEQUENT INJURIES FUND, WINSHIP PROPERTIES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ELIZABETH COCHRAN vs. SUBSEQUENT INJURIES FUND, WINSHIP PROPERTIES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ELIZABETH COCHRAN vs. SUBSEQUENT INJURIES FUND, WINSHIP PROPERTIES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

ELIZABETH COCHRAN vs. SUBSEQUENT INJURIES FUND, WINSHIP PROPERTIES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.