Home/Case Law/ELIZABETH ARGUELLES vs. APPLE ONE SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ELIZABETH ARGUELLES vs. APPLE ONE SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

Filed: Dec 24, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ3482987 (VNO 0361935) ADJ4225713 (VNO 0387387)

CompFox AI Summary

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision affirmed a finding that the Community Development Commission (CDC) is jointly and severally liable as a special employer for the applicant's injuries. The CDC's self-insurance was deemed other insurance under Insurance Code section 1063.1, precluding liability for CIGA. The Board found the CDC waived statute of limitations and procedural joinder defenses due to a four-year delay in raising them. Consequently, the CDC remains responsible for providing workers' compensation benefits.

ELIZABETH ARGUELLES vs. APPLE ONE SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision affirmed a finding that the Community Development Commission (CDC) is jointly and severally liable as a special employer for the applicant's injuries. The CDC's self-insurance was deemed "other insurance" under Insurance Code section 1063.1, precluding liability for CIGA. The Board found the CDC waived statute of limitations and procedural joinder defenses due to a four-year delay in raising them. Consequently, the CDC remains responsible for providing workers' compensation benefits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ELIZABETH ARGUELLES vs. APPLE ONE SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ELIZABETH ARGUELLES vs. APPLE ONE SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ELIZABETH ARGUELLES vs. APPLE ONE SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Case Analysis

ELIZABETH ARGUELLES vs. APPLE ONE SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.