Home/Case Law/ELISEO PEREZ vs. ACEVEDO CONTRACTING, MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

ELISEO PEREZ vs. ACEVEDO CONTRACTING, MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE

Filed: May 04, 2017
Santa Ana
ADJ9268483

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed against an interlocutory order, not a final decision on substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied the Petition for Removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would necessitate this extraordinary remedy. Removal was also denied as reconsideration was deemed an adequate future remedy. Therefore, the petitions were dismissed and denied accordingly.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed against an interlocutory order, not a final decision on substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied the Petition for Removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would necessitate this extraordinary remedy. Removal was also denied as reconsideration was deemed an adequate future remedy. Therefore, the petitions were dismissed and denied accordingly.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.