Home/Case Law/ELISA WILLITS-SPOLIN vs. HATHAWAY CHILDREN'S SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION (CIGA), BROADSPIRE for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION
Regular DecisionRemoval

ELISA WILLITS-SPOLIN vs. HATHAWAY CHILDREN'S SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION (CIGA), BROADSPIRE for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION

Filed: Nov 09, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ941704 (VNO 0450657)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's petition for removal because it was unverified, a requirement under WCAB Rule 10843(b). The defendant sought to rescind an order closing discovery and continuing the case to trial, alleging due process violations. Even if the petition had been properly verified, the WCAB would have denied it on its merits. The WCAB also noted that removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which the defendant failed to demonstrate.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's petition for removal because it was unverified, a requirement under WCAB Rule 10843(b). The defendant sought to rescind an order closing discovery and continuing the case to trial, alleging due process violations. Even if the petition had been properly verified, the WCAB would have denied it on its merits. The WCAB also noted that removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which the defendant failed to demonstrate.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ELISA WILLITS-SPOLIN vs. HATHAWAY CHILDREN'S SERVICES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION (CIGA), BROADSPIRE for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox