Home/Case Law/EDUARDO CASTILLO vs. GENERAL MOTORS; permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

EDUARDO CASTILLO vs. GENERAL MOTORS; permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

Filed: Jan 26, 2016
Van Nuys
ADJ8836050

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, rescinding the WCJ's orders appointing new orthopedic and psychiatric evaluators. The Board found the WCJ erred by directly appointing new physicians without first attempting to supplement existing medical reports or deposing prior evaluators, as per the McDuffie precedent. The Board determined the existing medical reports were not "fatally flawed" and directed the parties to pursue supplemental opinions or depositions before appointing new evaluators.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, rescinding the WCJ's orders appointing new orthopedic and psychiatric evaluators. The Board found the WCJ erred by directly appointing new physicians without first attempting to supplement existing medical reports or deposing prior evaluators, as per the McDuffie precedent. The Board determined the existing medical reports were not "fatally flawed" and directed the parties to pursue supplemental opinions or depositions before appointing new evaluators.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

EDUARDO CASTILLO vs. GENERAL MOTORS; permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. (2016) – Van Nuys | CompFox