Home/Case Law/Downs v. CNA Insurance Co.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Downs v. CNA Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Mr. Downs, the plaintiff, appealed a workers' compensation judgment concerning the computation of his disability compensation. He sustained extensive injuries to his left wrist and elbow after falling thirty feet from a bucket while clearing power lines for his employer, Spiceland Tree Surgery Co. Despite undergoing multiple surgeries and physical therapy, Dr. David Gaw, an orthopedic surgeon, assessed a 20% impairment of his left upper extremity. The trial court initially set his disability rating at 25%, but the appellate court found this insufficient. The court considered various pertinent factors beyond anatomical disability, including job skills, education, and job opportunities, and ultimately concluded that Mr. Downs' vocational disability for his arm should be set at 50%. The case was remanded with instructions to re-award permanent partial disability, recalculate temporary partial disability payments, and order the defendant to pay additional medical expenses.

Downs v. CNA Insurance Co. is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Supreme Court.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Mr. Downs, the plaintiff, appealed a workers' compensation judgment concerning the computation of his disability compensation. He sustained extensive injuries to his left wrist and elbow after falling thirty feet from a bucket while clearing power lines for his employer, Spiceland Tree Surgery Co. Despite undergoing multiple surgeries and physical therapy, Dr. David Gaw, an orthopedic surgeon, assessed a 20% impairment of his left upper extremity. The trial court initially set his disability rating at 25%, but the appellate court found this insufficient. The court considered various pertinent factors beyond anatomical disability, including job skills, education, and job opportunities, and ultimately concluded that Mr. Downs' vocational disability for his arm should be set at 50%. The case was remanded with instructions to re-award permanent partial disability, recalculate temporary partial disability payments, and order the defendant to pay additional medical expenses.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Downs v. CNA Insurance Co. workers compensation case in Tennessee Supreme Court. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Downs v. CNA Insurance Co. case law summary from Tennessee Supreme Court. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Downs v. CNA Insurance Co. Case Analysis

Downs v. CNA Insurance Co. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.