Home/Case Law/DOUGLAS FORZETTING vs. OCEANO ICE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, By Its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED, For FREMONT INSURANCE, In Liquidation
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DOUGLAS FORZETTING vs. OCEANO ICE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, By Its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED, For FREMONT INSURANCE, In Liquidation

Filed: Jun 03, 2008
San Francisco
GRO 0023551, GRO 0025948

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration to correct clerical errors in the dates of injury for two separate back injuries sustained by the applicant while working for the same employer. The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's decision regarding permanent disability ratings and apportionment, adhering to the binding precedent established in Benson v. The Permanente Medical Group. The lien claimant's petition for reconsideration was dismissed as interlocutory orders deferring liens are not final decisions subject to review.

DOUGLAS FORZETTING vs. OCEANO ICE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, By Its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED, For FREMONT INSURANCE, In Liquidation is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration to correct clerical errors in the dates of injury for two separate back injuries sustained by the applicant while working for the same employer. The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's decision regarding permanent disability ratings and apportionment, adhering to the binding precedent established in Benson v. The Permanente Medical Group. The lien claimant's petition for reconsideration was dismissed as interlocutory orders deferring liens are not final decisions subject to review.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

DOUGLAS FORZETTING vs. OCEANO ICE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, By Its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED, For FREMONT INSURANCE, In Liquidation workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

DOUGLAS FORZETTING vs. OCEANO ICE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, By Its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED, For FREMONT INSURANCE, In Liquidation case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

DOUGLAS FORZETTING vs. OCEANO ICE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, By Its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED, For FREMONT INSURANCE, In Liquidation Case Analysis

DOUGLAS FORZETTING vs. OCEANO ICE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, By Its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED, For FREMONT INSURANCE, In Liquidation is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.