CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address an internally inconsistent clause in a Stipulated Award. Defendant sought to clarify the commencement date for the State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) adjustment to the applicant's life pension. The Board construed the ambiguous clause, drafted by the applicant's attorney, in favor of the defendant. Consequently, the SAWW increase will commence in accordance with the Baker v. WCAB decision, effective January 1, 2018.
DOROTHY VANDENBERG vs. KINGS COUNTY is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address an internally inconsistent clause in a Stipulated Award. Defendant sought to clarify the commencement date for the State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) adjustment to the applicant's life pension. The Board construed the ambiguous clause, drafted by the applicant's attorney, in favor of the defendant. Consequently, the SAWW increase will commence in accordance with the Baker v. WCAB decision, effective January 1, 2018.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.