CompFox AI Summary
Defendant sought reconsideration of a $100%$ permanent disability award, arguing the judge erred in relying on the DEU rating specialist, an improperly appointed physician, and awarding psychiatric treatment without a psychiatric injury finding. Lien claimant Midas Recovery Services also sought reconsideration, as its lien for disability benefits was not addressed. The Appeals Board granted both petitions due to a severely disorganized case file that hampered review. Consequently, the original decision was rescinded, and the case was returned to the trial level for proper record preparation and a new decision.
DOROTHY JESSEE vs. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Defendant sought reconsideration of a $100%$ permanent disability award, arguing the judge erred in relying on the DEU rating specialist, an improperly appointed physician, and awarding psychiatric treatment without a psychiatric injury finding. Lien claimant Midas Recovery Services also sought reconsideration, as its lien for disability benefits was not addressed. The Appeals Board granted both petitions due to a severely disorganized case file that hampered review. Consequently, the original decision was rescinded, and the case was returned to the trial level for proper record preparation and a new decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.