CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration in this case. The dismissal was based on the petition being untimely, improperly served, and lacking substantive merit. The Board adopted the administrative law judge's report, which found the petition did not provide grounds to set aside the prior Order Approving Compromise and Release, as that order was supported by substantial medical evidence. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was formally dismissed.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration in this case. The dismissal was based on the petition being untimely, improperly served, and lacking substantive merit. The Board adopted the administrative law judge's report, which found the petition did not provide grounds to set aside the prior Order Approving Compromise and Release, as that order was supported by substantial medical evidence. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was formally dismissed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.