Home/Case Law/DONALD ARMSTRONG vs. GRAY LIFT, INCORPORATED, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DONALD ARMSTRONG vs. GRAY LIFT, INCORPORATED, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Nov 20, 2007
San Francisco
GRO 0030263

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns the applicant's request for reimbursement of $$455.00$ for services rendered by Wallace & Associates. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the finding that the defendant is not liable for this bill. The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence, such as a report or testimony, to demonstrate that Ms. Wallace's services were necessary or had the potential to affect the permanent disability rating in this case, particularly since the settlement relied on an older rating schedule.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns the applicant's request for reimbursement of $$455.00$ for services rendered by Wallace & Associates. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the finding that the defendant is not liable for this bill. The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence, such as a report or testimony, to demonstrate that Ms. Wallace's services were necessary or had the potential to affect the permanent disability rating in this case, particularly since the settlement relied on an older rating schedule.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DONALD ARMSTRONG vs. GRAY LIFT, INCORPORATED, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox