Home/Case Law/DIANE CECENA vs. WALT DISNEY COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DIANE CECENA vs. WALT DISNEY COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: May 15, 2013
San Francisco
ADJ2220422

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Diane Cecena's petition for reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's decision. The applicant argued that SB899's apportionment laws should not apply to her 2000 date of injury, but the Board cited case law affirming SB899's applicability to all pending cases. While noting the applicant's counsel repeatedly misstated the law and violated WCAB rules, the Board declined to assess sanctions but issued a strong admonishment.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Diane Cecena's petition for reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's decision. The applicant argued that SB899's apportionment laws should not apply to her 2000 date of injury, but the Board cited case law affirming SB899's applicability to all pending cases. While noting the applicant's counsel repeatedly misstated the law and violated WCAB rules, the Board declined to assess sanctions but issued a strong admonishment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DIANE CECENA vs. WALT DISNEY COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY (2013) – San Francisco | CompFox