CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration for both applicant and defendant in this case. The Board rescinded the prior findings and orders, returning the matters to the judge for further proceedings. While the presumption of compensability did not apply to the cumulative trauma claim, the opinions of the Agreed Medical Evaluator were deemed substantial evidence for permanent disability and medical treatment. Issues regarding attorney's fees for temporary disability were also addressed, with the Board agreeing that these had been previously awarded and paid.
DIANA KOHAN vs. ROBINSON'S MAY/MACY'S CORPORATE SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Monica. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Monica.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration for both applicant and defendant in this case. The Board rescinded the prior findings and orders, returning the matters to the judge for further proceedings. While the presumption of compensability did not apply to the cumulative trauma claim, the opinions of the Agreed Medical Evaluator were deemed substantial evidence for permanent disability and medical treatment. Issues regarding attorney's fees for temporary disability were also addressed, with the Board agreeing that these had been previously awarded and paid.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.