Home/Case Law/Derrick v. Bergren
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Derrick v. Bergren

New York Supreme Court
MISSING

What Does the CompFox AI Summary Show?

This case involves multiple actions stemming from a March 8, 2001, motor vehicle collision between a jury bus driven by New York State court officer Ludwicki and a vehicle owned by Bergren. The Commissioner of Jurors of Kings County owns the jury bus. Defendant Commissioner of Jurors moved to dismiss all actions against him, arguing that as a state official, actions for monetary damages should be brought in the Court of Claims. The motion also sought to dismiss plaintiff Boles's action (Action No. 2) against defendant Ludwicki, asserting it is barred by the Workers' Compensation Law. The court granted both branches of the motion, ruling that the Commissioner of Jurors is a state official and claims against him in his official capacity must be heard in the Court of Claims, and that Boles's sole remedy against Ludwicki, a coworker, is under the Workers' Compensation Law.

Derrick v. Bergren is a workers' compensation case decided in New York Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in New York Supreme Court.

How Can I Read the Full Decision Text?

This case involves multiple actions stemming from a March 8, 2001, motor vehicle collision between a jury bus driven by New York State court officer Ludwicki and a vehicle owned by Bergren. The Commissioner of Jurors of Kings County owns the jury bus. Defendant Commissioner of Jurors moved to dismiss all actions against him, arguing that as a state official, actions for monetary damages should be brought in the Court of Claims. The motion also sought to dismiss plaintiff Boles's action (Action No. 2) against defendant Ludwicki, asserting it is barred by the Workers' Compensation Law. The court granted both branches of the motion, ruling that the Commissioner of Jurors is a state official and claims against him in his official capacity must be heard in the Court of Claims, and that Boles's sole remedy against Ludwicki, a coworker, is under the Workers' Compensation Law.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Derrick v. Bergren workers compensation case in New York Supreme Court. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Derrick v. Bergren case law summary from New York Supreme Court. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

What Is the Full Case Analysis for Derrick v. Bergren?

Derrick v. Bergren is a legal case related to workers' compensation in New York Supreme Court. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to Streamline Your Practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.