Home/Case Law/DEREK VELASQUEZ vs. JOSE VELASQUEZ, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DEREK VELASQUEZ vs. JOSE VELASQUEZ, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Oct 24, 2007
San Francisco
GOL 0099213

CompFox AI Summary

In this workers' compensation case, the applicant sought reconsideration of a decision barring his temporary disability claim under Labor Code Section 4656(c)(1). The applicant conceded the claim was barred but argued the statute was unconstitutional, violating equal protection. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, adopting the Administrative Law Judge's report which stated the Board lacks jurisdiction to determine the constitutionality of statutes.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In this workers' compensation case, the applicant sought reconsideration of a decision barring his temporary disability claim under Labor Code Section 4656(c)(1). The applicant conceded the claim was barred but argued the statute was unconstitutional, violating equal protection. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, adopting the Administrative Law Judge's report which stated the Board lacks jurisdiction to determine the constitutionality of statutes.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DEREK VELASQUEZ vs. JOSE VELASQUEZ, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox