Home/Case Law/DEONTE WALKER vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES
Regular DecisionRemoval Petition

DEONTE WALKER vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES

Filed: Nov 02, 2018
Sacramento
ADJ11085852

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant sought removal of a Notice of Hearing alleging prejudice from a full-day trial instead of an expedited hearing for his admitted industrial injury to the psyche and stress. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the petition, emphasizing that removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of irreparable harm. The WCAB found that the scheduled trial was justified by the complexity and witness testimony, and an expedited hearing was not guaranteed to be earlier. Therefore, the applicant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant sought removal of a Notice of Hearing alleging prejudice from a full-day trial instead of an expedited hearing for his admitted industrial injury to the psyche and stress. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the petition, emphasizing that removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of irreparable harm. The WCAB found that the scheduled trial was justified by the complexity and witness testimony, and an expedited hearing was not guaranteed to be earlier. Therefore, the applicant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DEONTE WALKER vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES (2018) – Sacramento | CompFox