CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board adopted the judge's report, which found the applicant not to be an employee of Chula Vista Tours. This determination was based on the judge's assessment of the applicant's testimony as not credible, citing evidence of threats and suspicious timing of treatment and claim filing relative to a restraining order. The Board gave great weight to the judge's credibility findings, as is customary.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board adopted the judge's report, which found the applicant not to be an employee of Chula Vista Tours. This determination was based on the judge's assessment of the applicant's testimony as not credible, citing evidence of threats and suspicious timing of treatment and claim filing relative to a restraining order. The Board gave great weight to the judge's credibility findings, as is customary.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.